Unethical puppy selling

by | Feb 29, 2024

source: facebook.com

SHOCK!

What else can you call this post (screenshot above), which appeared last week on the Facebook social network on a page dedicated to Entlebucher lovers? This post unequivocally proves the claim that the owner of Balihara Ranch is selling puppies in a way that, apart from being unethical and having nothing to do with the love of dogs, is also prohibited by the rules of the FCI organization she is supposed to follow! A post from a person from Canada appeared in the comments, which said that the owner of Balihara Ranch sent puppies to North America to resell them. Disgusting, right? But let’s also explain below why this is so.

This blog post aims to raise awareness about a horrible practice of the owner of Balihara Ranch that has caused concern: selling a puppy with the expectation that the new owner will find another home for it. This practice, often referred to as “rehoming on behalf of the breeder,” raises significant ethical and welfare concerns for the dogs involved.

Why is this practice problematic?

Uncertain Future and Multiple Homes: When a breeder sells a puppy with the expectation that the new owner will find another home, she relinquishes control over the dog’s future. This means the puppy could end up in any number of environments, with people of unknown backgrounds and varying levels of commitment to responsible dog ownership. This uncertainty can be incredibly stressful for the dog, who craves stability and a sense of belonging.

Impact on Puppy Development: Puppies go through critical socialization periods during their early months. These periods are crucial for them to learn how to interact with other dogs, people, and their environment in a healthy and balanced way. Changing homes multiple times disrupts this crucial developmental stage, potentially leading to behavioral issues such as anxiety, fearfulness, or aggression.

Ethical Concerns and Breeder Conduct: The International Cynological Federation (FCI) explicitly prohibits the sale of dogs through intermediaries, which includes the practice of expecting the new owner to find another home for the puppy. This regulation aims to protect dogs from ending up in unsuitable environments or being exploited for profit.

Prioritizing Profit Over Welfare: When a breeder prioritizes finding homes for puppies through an intermediary, without proper screening of potential owners or ensuring the long-term well-being of the animal, it raises concerns about their commitment to ethical breeding practices.

Shockingly, such irresponsible puppy sales practices are being done by an FCI-licensed dog judge, the owner of Balihara Ranch.

Send a comment

* name and email address are optional, you can send the comment anonymously

CONTINUE READING

When Numbers Start Calling the Shots: The Economics Turning Breeding Into a Production Model (Part I)

by | Jan 8, 2026

When breeding is driven by numbers, its underlying logic shifts. Available data on Balihara Ranch indicate repeated use of the same sire–dam combinations, yielding dozens of puppies from the same pair. This article examines where responsible breeding selection ends and a production model begins—and why, without firm guardrails, the system naturally steers breeders toward volume over thoughtful selection.

read more

A New Year’s Wish – If Dogs Could Speak

by | Jan 1, 2026

As we enter the New Year, our wish is not for more, but for less. Fewer litters and fewer dogs where breeding has become an industry. Less silence around large commercial breeding operations. Because not everything that is legal is also right—and dogs have no way to say so out loud.

read more

The Cost of a Career Built on Dogs

by | Dec 18, 2025

When dog breeding becomes the primary source of income and identity, stepping back without losses becomes impossible. A large commercial breeding operation like Balihara Ranch requires constant escalation, the concealment of reality, and the defense of a system that can no longer be acknowledged as problematic. This is not an individual failure, but the logical outcome of a career built exclusively on dogs.

read more

The Qaiser van’t Stokerybos Case: Paper Exports as an Illusion of Oversight Part II: How a System Can Appear Lawful While Being Circumvented in Practice

by | Dec 11, 2025

The Qaiser van’t Stokerybos case shows how easily exports in dog breeding can be used not for cooperation between breeders, but to bypass the rules. A dog may be officially registered abroad while being physically used to breed females elsewhere—without the system addressing that contradiction.

read more