The ethics of dog breeding: Balancing profit and welfare

by | Feb 15, 2024

Introduction

Breeding dogs is a complex endeavor that requires careful consideration of both ethical and practical factors. When it comes to breeding practices, opinions can vary widely. In this article, we’ll delve into the controversial topic of back-to-back breeding—a practice where a female dog (bitch) is mated again shortly after giving birth to a litter. Specifically, we’ll explore the case of Balihara Ranch kennel, where such practices have raised eyebrows and sparked debate.

Reasons for back-to-back breeding

  • Increasing the number of puppies from a female during her breeding life.
  • Shortening the interval between litters of puppies.
  • Increasing breeding productivity.

Disadvantages of back-to-back breeding

  • Increased physical and psychological demands on the female.
  • Increased risk of health complications for both the female and the puppies.
  • Reduction in the quality of puppies.

The Balihara Ranch Controversy

At Balihara Ranch, female dogs are mated just 2–3 months after their previous litter. This rapid turnaround raises several critical questions:

  • Health and Well-Being: The standard practice is for a dam to care for her puppies for approximately two months. But at Balihara Ranch, the turnaround is swift. How does this impact the health and well-being of the mother dog? Is she given enough time to recover physically and emotionally?
  • Profit vs. Welfare: Clearly, this approach treats dogs as mere commodities. The focus seems to be on maximizing profit rather than ensuring the welfare of the animals. But is this ethical? Shouldn’t responsible breeding prioritize the health and happiness of the dogs over financial gains?
  • Pedigree and Ethics: Balihara Ranch is not alone in its practices. However, the difference lies in the pedigree. While typical dog factories churn out puppies without regard for lineage, Balihara Ranch claims to breed pedigreed dogs. Does this make a difference? Or is it just a marketing ploy and the dogs at Balihara Ranch are treated the same as in a lowly puppy mill factory?

The Role of Relevant Clubs and the FCI

The Kennel Club and the Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI) play crucial roles in regulating dog breeding. They set standards, guidelines, and ethical norms. So how does Balihara Ranch’s approach align with these organizations’ principles?

  • Legal and Ethical Boundaries: Back-to-back mating is generally frowned upon by responsible breeders. Some countries even consider it illegal for licensed breeders. The health of the bitch and the well-being of the puppies take precedence.
  • Balihara Ranch Perspective: The owner of Balihara Ranch defends her practices. She argues that her dogs are well-cared-for and healthy. But is this enough? Shouldn’t ethical breeding go beyond physical health and consider emotional well-being?

The Dilemma: Profit vs. Ethics

Ultimately, the debate boils down to a fundamental question: Are dogs commodities or sentient beings? Responsible breeders recognize the emotional and physical toll that breeding takes on both the bitch and her offspring. They prioritize the long-term welfare of the animals over short-term gains.

Conclusion

As prospective dog owners, it’s essential to be informed. When choosing a breeder, consider not only the pedigree but also the breeder’s ethics. Responsible breeding involves respect for dogs, allowing them time to recover, and ensuring their well-being. So, let’s take a close look at the Number of days between litters at Balihara Ranch and reflect on the delicate balance between profit and compassion in the world of dog breeding.

Share this:

Send a comment

* name and email address are optional, you can send the comment anonymously

CONTINUE READING

When the System Stops Protecting Dogs: The Blind Spots in the FCI System and Breed Clubs That Enable Extreme-Scale Breeding (Part II)

In the first part, we showed where the system fails in the field — in limits, inspections, and exports. This second part uncovers something even more serious: club-level exceptions, conflicts of interest, and lax oversight by the Slovak Cynological Union (SKJ), all of which have allowed kennels like Balihara Ranch to grow to a scale that today’s mechanisms can no longer effectively regulate.

read more

When the System Stops Protecting Dogs:The Blind Spots in the FCI System and Breed Clubs That Enable Extreme-Scale Breeding (Part I)

Current rules of the FCI and breed clubs contain fundamental blind spots: no limits on litters, no meaningful welfare inspections and weak oversight of exports. These gaps create the conditions in which extreme-scale kennels can thrive. And the only way to stop them is to change the system itself — not to address individual cases, such as the Balihara Ranch kennel, only after they grow beyond what today’s club and legislative mechanisms are capable of handling.

read more

When One Breeder Needs Two Breeding Advisors: An Unusual Decision of the Slovak Club of Swiss Mountain Dogs That Reveals More Than It First Appears

The Slovak Club of Swiss Mountain Dogs has published an exceptional detail: two breeding advisors assigned to the owner of the Balihara Ranch kennel — the only such case in the entire system. This rare exception signals that behind the polished façade of the kennel may conceal a far greater scale of breeding activity and administrative workload than the public typically imagines.

read more

When Facts Move Behind Closed Doors: How the Slovak Club of Swiss Mountain Dogs Locked Its Breeding Records After One Member’s Complaint

The Slovak Club of Swiss Mountain Dogs (SKSSP) has moved its breeding data behind closed doors after a complaint from the owner of Balihara Ranch Kennel. The data didn’t vanish — they were simply moved out of sight. Transparency has turned into a privilege, leaving honest breeders in the shadow of those who found facts inconvenient.

read more