How Balihara Ranch kennel pushes its females to the edge — early, often, and relentlessly.

Balihara Ranch, at least in the way its owner portrays it, looks like a model kennel. But the facts point elsewhere — toward a very different reality.

This kennel promotes itself as a responsible breeding operation, claiming to practice “carefully planned matings.” However, a closer look at the breeding records paints a troubling picture of intensive, limit-pushing reproduction — a pattern explored in detail below.

Excessive Number of Litters per Dam

Breed-specific and kennel regulations generally stress the importance of limiting the number of litters per female for health and welfare reasons. Many national kennel clubs under the FCI (Fédération Cynologique Internationale) recommend a maximum of 4 to 5 litters per female, and prohibit breeding past 8 years of age. Balihara Ranch, however, appears to operate far outside these ethical boundaries. Data shows that several females have had 6 to 8 litters—well beyond common welfare limits (read more in our article: https://balihararanch.review/born-to-suffer-kataleya-from-balihara-ranchs-life-of-slavery-forced-to-give-birth-again-and-again/ ).

One particular female at Balihara Ranch produced over 60 puppies across eight litters—an astonishing number that underscores the intensity of her reproductive burden (read more in our article: https://balihararanch.review/the-pure-cruel-and-disgasting-practices-of-balihara-ranch-kennel-the-most-destitute-female-in-the-kennel/ ). 

This level of reproductive strain is deeply concerning and falls far short of what any legitimate breeder would consider acceptable (read more in our article: https://balihararanch.review/balihara-ranch-81-dogs-approved-for-breeding-in-12-years-a-report-on-mass-breeding-under-the-fci-banner/ ).

Does this look like thoughtful breeding—or a numbers game?

First Litters from Underage Females

Another red flag in Balihara Ranch’s breeding practices is the alarmingly young age at which many females are bred. For larger breeds—such as the Swiss Mountain Dog types—they should not be bred before 24 months of age, according to best-practice welfare guidelines. At this age, a female is both physically and psychologically mature enough for the demands of motherhood.  Yet Balihara Ranch’s records show multiple females whelping as early as 17.5 months—well below recommended welfare thresholds.

For example:

• Fantasy iz Blagorodnoho doma had her first litter at just 534 days old (approximately 17.5 months),
• Yessica II. from Balihara Ranch at 538 days (~17.7 months),
• Alpha Omegga from Balihara Ranch at 542 days (~17.9 months).

These cases suggest a systematic practice of breeding females at the earliest moment legally or biologically feasible—regardless of their maturity or well-being. While the FCI does not enforce a universal minimum breeding age, most national kennel clubs recommend at least 18 months, and for large breeds, 24 months is the standard. Balihara Ranch’s practices clearly defy these recommendations.

So what’s driving this push for early breeding, frequent pregnancies, and maximum litter counts—if not financial motivation? From an ethical standpoint, such practices represent a serious breach of responsible breeding standards. Premature motherhood can jeopardize both the health of the young dam and the well-being of her puppies.

Insufficient Recovery Time Between Litters

Rest Between Litters? Not at the Balihara Ranch kennel.

A cornerstone of responsible breeding is ensuring that dams have sufficient recovery time between litters. The recommendations here are crystal clear: a female should have no more than one litter per year. For example, Germany’s SSV (Schweizer Sennenhund-Verein für Deutschland) mandates at least 10 months between litters and allows only one litter per female per calendar year.

Yet once again, Balihara Ranch falls drastically short of meeting these welfare-based guidelines.

The breeding records reveal shockingly short intervals between pregnancies, pointing to what can only be described as systemic overuse of breeding females. For instance:

• Mirabilis from Balihara Ranch delivered two litters only 118 days apart—less than four months between births.
• Feebee from Earth’s Axis and Lillith from Balihara Ranch had litters spaced just 155 days apart, roughly five months.

Given that the average canine pregnancy lasts approximately 63 days, these figures suggest the females were re-bred as early as 6 to 8 weeks postpartum—a period when they are still nursing and barely beginning to physically recover. The implication is that these dogs are routinely bred during their first heat after giving birth, denying them any genuine rest or recovery.

Breeding has given way to production. With no time to rest or recover, these females are trapped in a relentless cycle of reproduction.  That’s not how love for a breed is shown—it’s how puppies are mass-produced.

Official Breeding Guidelines vs. Breeding Practices at Balihara Ranch

When measured against the official guidelines of the FCI and its national member clubs, the practices at Balihara Ranch are in glaring violation. To summarize the key welfare-based standards:

• Minimum age for first mating: 18 months
• Maximum lifetime litters per dam: 4 to 5
• Recommended gap between litters: at least 10 months

These rules are not arbitrary. They exist to protect the health of the dam and ensure the quality of her offspring. The Swiss Mountain Dog breeds (Bernese Mountain Dog, Greater Swiss, Appenzeller, and Entlebucher) are larger, slow-maturing breeds—all the more reason to enforce conservative and welfare-conscious breeding schedules.

Clubs like Germany’s SSV strictly enforce such limits. But at Balihara Ranch, these foundational principles appear to be routinely ignored. Females are bred too young, too often, and with minimal recovery time— a pattern that prioritizes quantity over care.

Breed registry records show that, under the direction of its owner, Balihara Ranch produces over 100 puppies annually, with a cumulative output nearing 3,000 puppies. At this scale, can we still call it breeding? Or are we looking at an industrial puppy production facility?

Conclusion – A Reflection for True Breed Enthusiasts

When reviewing the facts presented, one must ask a fundamental question: What does “carefully planned breeding” look like in the hands of Balihara Ranch’s owner? Judging by the data, it appears more like a marketing catchphrase than an actual breeding philosophy.

True responsible breeding should prioritize the health and well-being of the dam, the quality of the puppies, and the preservation of breed standards. But at Balihara Ranch, a clear pattern of early, frequent, and intensive breeding reveals a disturbing reality of overuse and commercial exploitation.

A truly ethical breeder knows when to stop. At Balihara Ranch, however, the throttle isn’t eased—it’s floored.

The facts speak for themselves—and they speak loudly.

If this article resonated with you, please share it. Let the truth reach more people who care.

Source Note

All information was obtained from publicly available data, and official breeding guidelines issued by the FCI and its member clubs for purebred dogs. All cited figures are verifiable and illustrate the stark contrast between Balihara Ranch’s declared breeding philosophy and its actual practices.

Coming up in Part 5:

MYTH #5: “Responsible Breeding” vs. Public Records That Raise Serious Concerns